Rittenhouse verdict ‘a chilling precedent on armed vigilantes’

Civil rights groups and gun control activists in America have warned that the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse in his closely watched double murder trial sets a chilling precedent for vigilante violence.

he verdict last week “will only invite greater political violence at the hands of individuals who believe their guns transform them into untouchable super citizens,” Guns Down America’s executive director Igor Volsky said.

Mr Rittenhouse, now 18, was found not guilty on five counts for killing two men and injuring another with an AR-15-style rifle in the aftermath of police brutality protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin, when he was 17 years old on August 25, 2020.

“Since we live in a country where a white person like Rittenhouse is able to cross state lines with an assault weapon during a racial justice protest, take the lives of two, gravely injure a third, and successfully paint himself as the victim, we must recommit ourselves to redefining public safety,” Mr Volsky said.

Mr Rittenhouse did not bring his weapon across state lines, he obtained the rifle in Kenosha.

March for Our Lives, formed by high school students in the wake of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida in 2018, said the trial “lays bare everything we’ve been talking about for years”.

“It is so very clear that Kyle Rittenhouse embodies the very danger posed by a toxic mix of a white supremacist culture that values property over human life, and wide proliferation of high-powered guns with fewer limits than a driver’s licence,” the organisation said in a statement.

Following a call from local militias for armed support to the area, Mr Rittenhouse travelled from his home in nearby Antioch, Illinois and, armed with an AR-15-style rifle in Kenosha, amid protests over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man, by a white police officer, just several weeks after the police murder of George Floyd.

He was charged with five felony counts of first-degree reckless homicide, first-degree intentional homicide and attempted first-degree intentional homicide, and two counts of recklessly endangering safety in the first degree.

His lawyers argued he fired his gun in self-defence after he was chased by a mob.

The American Civil Liberties Union pointed to the permissiveness of weaponised self-styled militias and the criminal justice system’s failure to protect against them.

“This complicity, along with the reason for the protests that Rittenhouse took it upon himself to confront – the police shooting of a black man outside of a family function – highlights that the violence in Kenosha is not an anomaly, but rather endemic to a system built upon white supremacy,” said Brandon Buskey, director of the ACLU’s Criminal Law Reform Project.

Sherrilyn Flynn, president and director counsel for the NAACP Legal Defence and Educational Fund, said the shootings “must be understood within an environment in which armed militias and vigilantes are acting to silence protesters, and where state legislatures have advanced anti-protest bills in the aftermath of demonstrations calling for racial justice,” she said.

Source link

Spread the love

Written by bourbiza

What we learned from WWE star King Woods’ interview

Cryptocurrency to become a key part of Australia’s financial system says government