in

Grandfather, 49, who tried to sue for £600,000 after claiming a piece harm left him so disabled he could not even pull up his underpants is jailed after being filmed doing his Christmas procuring

Grandfather, 49, who tried to sue for £600,000 after claiming a piece harm left him so disabled he could not even pull up his underpants is jailed after being filmed doing his Christmas procuring


An ‘inept’ insurance coverage fraudster who pretended he was so disabled he could not even pull up his underpants has been jailed and faces a £150,000 court docket invoice after being filmed doing his Christmas procuring.

Mark Hilton, 49, of Dartford, Kent, suffered tender tissue accidents when a heavy gas hose fell onto him as he crammed a tanker whereas working as a driver for Elliott Thomas Group Ltd in July 2015.

Suing for over £600,000 in compensation, the grandfather-of-six claimed the harm had left him so badly disabled he could not even costume himself or elevate a cup of tea along with his proper hand and wanted a zimmer body to stroll

However his declare unravelled when non-public investigators caught him on movie strolling his canine, Christmas procuring in Ikea, fixing his automobile and visiting the West Ham retailer at Stratford.

Mark Hilton, 49, of Dartford, Kent, suffered soft tissue injuries when a heavy fuel hose fell onto him as he filled a tanker while working as a driver for Elliott Thomas Group Ltd in July 2015

Mark Hilton, 49, of Dartford, Kent, suffered tender tissue accidents when a heavy gas hose fell onto him as he crammed a tanker whereas working as a driver for Elliott Thomas Group Ltd in July 2015

Mr Hilton’s declare was thrown out of court docket by a decide and now, after he admitted contempt of court docket, he’s dealing with a £150,000 invoice and a ten-month jail sentence for his ‘false and grossly exaggerated’ declare.

Sentencing and handing him the prices invoice for the case on the Excessive Courtroom, Mr Justice Constable mentioned: ‘This was a most calculated – if ineptly executed – try at defrauding insurers.’

The court docket heard Mr Hilton had sustained solely ‘tender tissue’ accidents when, whereas filling a tanker at a depot in 2015, an enormous gas hose got here free and landed on him.

He initially lodged a ‘modest’ declare for compensation, however in the end claimed greater than £600,000 from his former employer’s insurers QBE UK Ltd.

In statements filed for his declare, Mr Hilton mentioned he wanted assist getting dressed, couldn’t drive, had to make use of a Zimmer body to get about and claimed he may solely stroll about 20 yards as a result of his incapacity.

‘I can not put my trousers or underpants up and I need assistance to get my proper arm into sleeves,’ he mentioned in his proof.

‘For all intents and functions I’m housebound,’ he added.

The insurers initially admitted legal responsibility, however turned suspicious of his claims and started an undercover surveillance operation towards him over a number of years.

The High Court heard Hilton exaggerated the extent of his injuries and claimed he had suffered a significant disability, but an undercover surveillance team tasked by the insurance company filmed him walking and shopping without difficulty

The High Court heard Hilton exaggerated the extent of his injuries and claimed he had suffered a significant disability, but an undercover surveillance team tasked by the insurance company filmed him walking and shopping without difficulty

The Excessive Courtroom heard Hilton exaggerated the extent of his accidents and claimed he had suffered a major incapacity, however an undercover surveillance crew tasked by the insurance coverage firm filmed him strolling and procuring with out problem

Footage from 2016 confirmed him driving to a store, strolling in with no stick, engaged on his automobile for an prolonged time period after which going to the West Ham United retailer in Stratford, the court docket heard.

In 2018, he was filmed strolling his canine with none obvious mobility issues and, in December 2019, he was seen driving to Ikea, the place he visited kitchen, lighting and Christmas departments.

The declare was in the end struck out and Mr Hilton hauled to the Excessive Courtroom to face accusations of contempt of court docket, accused of constructing ‘false’ statements to inflate his compensation declare.

Mr Hilton admitted the contempt, apologised for what he had completed and appeared earlier than Mr Justice Constable for sentencing in London final week.

Outlining the case for the insurer, QBE barrister Paul Higgins described Mr Hilton’s £600,000 compensation bid as a ‘very critical basic dishonesty case.’

In claiming he was so disabled he was successfully housebound and could not even pull up his pants or stroll very far, Mr Hilton had ‘grossly exaggerated’ his accidents.

‘He lied repeatedly to his then authorized advisors, the consultants, the court docket and QBE,’ he mentioned.

Jailing him for ten months, Mr Justice Constable mentioned Mr Hilton was responsible of a ‘very critical’ contempt of court docket.

‘By every act, he dedicated a really critical act of contempt of court docket,’ he mentioned.

‘There was an especially marked disparity between his actual capability to hold out day by day actions – which included engaged on his automobile, procuring, strolling – and a really critical curtailment of his life-style and skills, as described repeatedly in his witness statements and acted out in his makes an attempt to mislead the medicolegal consultants.

‘Probably the most aggravating facet of the contempt is the quantum of the declare – in extra of £600,000.

‘This was a most calculated, if ineptly executed, try at defrauding insurers.’

The decide took under consideration Mr Hilton’s mitigation, which included his apology to the court docket, earlier good character and his unhealthy well being, having had ministrokes prior to now.

‘I settle for that the results of those proceedings have been sufficiently distressing to make it inconceivable he would act in any comparable dishonest manner once more,’ he continued.

‘The shortest time period of custody I can impose is a interval of 10 months’ imprisonment.’

The decide additionally made an order that Mr Hilton be accountable for QBE’s prices of the case, which attorneys estimated at about £150,000.

Nevertheless, the court docket heard Mr Hilton won’t have the funds to pay.



Read more on dailymail

Written by bourbiza mohamed

Bourbiza Mohamed is a freelance journalist and political science analyst holding a Master's degree in Political Science. Armed with a sharp pen and a discerning eye, Bourbiza Mohamed contributes to various renowned sites, delivering incisive insights on current political and social issues. His experience translates into thought-provoking articles that spur dialogue and reflection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Hear audio from inside Trump election interference case courtroom

Hear audio from inside Trump election interference case courtroom

Watch stay: Family members of Israeli hostages maintain press convention in Vatican following ceasefire deal

Watch stay: Family members of Israeli hostages maintain press convention in Vatican following ceasefire deal