A household physician who served within the British Military has been banned from treating sufferers for six weeks after he groped a medical colleague’s backside throughout a drunken formal dinner at a army base.
Dr Graham Wheatley touched the girl on repeated events and was additionally accused of fondling her breast as he adjusted medals he had jokingly transferred from his personal dinner jacket onto her night robe.
The 60-year-old physician, who runs the Munro Medical Centre GP surgical procedure in Spalding, Lincolnshire, was stated to have turn into ‘extraordinarily inebriated’ after ingesting crimson wine and was seen to be ‘stumbling and unsteady on his ft and likewise slurring his phrases.’
Ultimately he obtained ‘very handsy’ with the girl after the meal and put his arm round her waist and touched her backside on ‘a number of events.’ She was stated to be ‘tearful, visibly distressed and shocked’ by the encounter.
On the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service, Wheatley was suspended from practise for six weeks after he was discovered responsible of sexually motivated misconduct and sexual harassment.
Dr Graham Wheatley has been banned from treating sufferers for six weeks after he groped a colleague’s backside
He has since resigned from his function at a safety organisation and is planning to enchantment.
A disciplinary panel dominated Wheatley had touched the girl’s backside and waist however cleared him of deliberately touching her breast after accepting the GP could have ‘by chance’ made contact with it while adjusting the medals on her gown.
The incident occurred in November 2021 when Wheatley, who served as medical officer within the British Military between 1986 and 2001, attended the three day Tri-service Trainers’ Convention which culminated within the formal dinner within the unnamed Officers’ Mess.
The Manchester listening to was advised the occasion had not taken place for 2 years as a result of Covid pandemic and the ambiance was described as ‘convivial’ with the 40 visitors ‘comfortable to socialize face-to-face after lockdown.’
Wheatley was seated on the highest desk the place 12 complimentary bottles of wine have been handed to the ten visitors seated round it.
Later throughout jovial dialog his medals have been pinned onto Ms A’s gown, excessive up on her chest. Issues started when he went to personally retrieve the medals as visitors moved into the bar space after the ultimate course of espresso and mints.
In a press release Ms A stated: ‘Dr Wheatley was extraordinarily inebriated and would proceed to hunt me out while I used to be in conversations with different visitors. He was very handsy and did put his fingers round my waist on multiple event.
‘I used to be attempting to divert his attentions to get him to go away and I bear in mind attempting to ship him away on a minimum of 4 separate events. However throughout one in every of these instances when Graham came visiting to the bar, he reached out to his medals that have been hooked up to my gown on my chest, and in doing so touched my boob.
‘I do not recall whether or not he stated something earlier than he reached out, however I understood from the state of affairs that he was seeking to alter the medals that had come unhooked. I feel Graham was touching my boob for about 10 seconds. He was drunk and so it wasn’t only a fast readjustment.’
Dr Graham Wheatley, 60, served as a medical officer within the British military between 1986 and 2001
One other medical colleague often called Dr B stated: ‘I recall standing up from the desk and noticed Graham, who was roughly 3-5 metres away from me at this level, pinning his medals onto Ms A’s chest. I bear in mind listening to him apologise, although I do not recall precisely what he stated
nor what Ms A stated in response, if something.
‘In the course of the night he additionally reached out in the direction of Ms A together with his left hand and finally made contact together with her buttock. I recall Ms A instantly asking him to cease and I may inform by the best way she stated what she stated that she was shocked and that she did not like Graham touching her buttock.
‘Ms A wasn’t actually capable of transfer away, as she was between Graham, the wall and the bar. recall interjecting and saying to Graham one thing alongside the traces of ‘you can’t try this form of factor Graham’. However I do not recall whether or not he stated something coherent in response to both myself or Ms A or anybody else within the group – he then moved away from the group.
‘The entire state of affairs would not have lasted any longer than a number of moments, probably a minute or so. Ms A then moved out into the hall solely a brief distance away from the bar and I bear in mind apologising to Ms A that this had occurred to her and saying that it was wholly inappropriate what Graham did. She was tearful, visibly distressed and shocked.
‘I obtained the impression that she that she was attempting to course of what had simply occurred within the context of the night as a complete.’
When he sobered up, Wheatley initially stated that he couldn’t bear in mind groping the girl and stated any such contact ‘will need to have been unintentional and was brought on by his drunken state.’ He then apologised usually for any offence he may need prompted as a consequence of his drunken state however in subsequent emails denied being drunk and sought in charge Ms A.
MPTS chairman Mr Andrew Clemes stated: ‘The Tribunal thought-about that Dr Wheatley was very intoxicated on the time the incident happened and he could have been disinhibited by alcohol. Ms A and Dr B weren’t intoxicated. That they had every consumed some alcohol however such consumption was impossible to have affected their capacity to watch and recall occasions.
‘The Tribunal accepted Ms A as a reputable witness as she had given a usually constant account which was unlikely to have been affected by extreme alcohol consumption.
‘Ms A and Dr Wheatley weren’t established buddies or acquaintances and have been occasional work colleagues at greatest. Dr Wheatley’s actions had created a degrading or humiliating surroundings for Ms A. Despite the fact that the incident had occurred exterior the office and was in a social setting, it was nonetheless unwelcome contact.’
Earlier defence counsel Kevin McCartney stated: ‘Dr Wheatley’s behaviour arose at a social state of affairs, not within the context of seeing sufferers, and adopted extra alcohol consumption. This was at a social operate, which was one of many first that Dr Wheatley had attended for the reason that restrictions imposed by the pandemic had been lifted and that this influenced his alcohol consumption.
‘Dr Wheatley recognises he had far an excessive amount of to drink that night time, and now makes use of methods to make sure that he doesn’t drink to extra at such occasions now or sooner or later and doesn’t trigger offence by undesirable touching.’
After the case Wheatley confirmed he was interesting towards the suspension. In a press release to his native newspaper he stated: ‘There has sadly been a wholly malicious criticism made by someone with no connection to the apply.
‘The primary witness has to date given a minimum of two totally different accounts and due to this, we have been shocked and really upset that the tribunal didn’t discover towards this allegation. Subsequently we anticipate it to be overturned on enchantment.’