bourbiza mohamed
A sure-fire method of figuring out if a supervisor is underneath strain is in the best way he reacts to a post-match grilling by the press. Some react with humble acceptance, some with disdain for his or her staff, some with unerring platitudes for what they’ve simply seen on the pitch – and others, with ‘snippy’ retorts.Such was the case on Sunday, when the Celtic boss Brendan Rodgers was interviewed by BBC reporter Jane Lewis, following his facet’s 3-1 defeat of Motherwell.Lewis – a seasoned skilled – had requested Rodgers to develop on some extent after she was advised that ‘the story has already been written about this group’ within the context of their league title race. To place this into context, Rangers at the moment are main the pack. Their lead is slender – by two factors – but it surely’s the primary time since February 2022 the Gers have been on high. Within the background, in the meantime, followers have been voicing their displeasure at current performances and the chat round Celtic’s probabilities of securing one other championship has already gone into overdrive.Rodgers appeared sad with the journalist’s line of questioning and when requested to elaborate on his level, mentioned : ‘No, no. You realize precisely what I imply.’ Celtic supervisor Brendan Rodgers was accused of ‘informal sexism’ after saying ‘good woman’ to BBC reporter Jane Lewis on the finish of a terse radio interview following his staff’s win at Motherwell Lewis had requested Rodgers to elaborate on a cryptic remark made in regards to the title race
Your browser doesn’t help iframes.
Lewis pressed once more for a follow-up, just for Rodgers to finish the interview. He was then heard saying: ‘Finished, good woman, properly performed.’Now, most of us reporters – female and male – have been on the flawed finish of an acid tongued supervisor. This in itself, just isn’t uncommon.Jurgen Klopp, Jose Mourinho, Gordon Strachan and a mess of others have given reporters brief shrift at instances in the event that they disagree with their line of questioning. Former Dundee United chairman Jim McLean took issues one step additional in 2000, when he famously lamped BBC reporter John Barnes on the finish of a TV interview. Mclean was subsequently pressured to resign.In Rodgers’ case, his solutions didn’t come throughout as overtly impolite or obnoxious. His refusal to reply questions, nevertheless, was certain to irk – given he, himself, had raised the purpose about Celtic ‘writing their very own story’. The questions have been additionally cheap – and legitimate – given Celtic have been the topic of current criticism by their followers.What has stirred the pot, nevertheless, is the condescending use of the phrases ‘good woman’ on the finish of the interview. Girls’s teams have been fast to react, calling Rodgers a ‘dinosaur’ and demanding an apology. Social media has additionally reacted with fury. The’ phrases ‘Embarrassing; sexist; misogynistic’ have all been used to explain his parting shot. Many have demanded an apology from the Celtic boss, with Rodgers branded a ‘dinosaur’ Rodgers has ended the interview with Lewis – who has many years of expertise – himself Celtic would possibly say that it is no totally different to utilizing the time period ‘good lad’ on the finish of an interview with a male reporter. Rodgers truly did this in a post-match interview with Sky Sports activities.The difficulty right here, nevertheless, is the very fact it was utilized in follow-up to an interview that he himself, shut down. Though Lewis laughed it off, it got here throughout as extremely belittling. I imply, significantly, would he have referred to as a male reporter a ‘good boy’ on the finish of an interview? Had he performed so, I would wish to suppose we would all be asking the identical query about his use of language. It wasn’t simply that, both. It was the WAY he mentioned it. It did not really feel like an absent-minded farewell. It felt extra like extra of a ‘telling off’. A form of : ‘That is it, good woman, run alongside now’ vibe.Add to that, the truth that Lewis has many years of value of expertise, and all of it feels fairly regarding.Placing myself in Lewis’ place, I might have been stunned at his terminology. I would most likely have gone off, muttering ‘Good woman? Good woman?’ in slight disbelief. It would not have been the worst I would skilled, nevertheless. Rodgers might not be sexist, however within the second used some poor terminology and it has backfired spectacularlyI as soon as had a state of affairs with a supervisor within the Scottish Championship who got here down on me like a ton of bricks after I questioned whether or not his place was now underneath menace, following a collection of poor outcomes. Not solely was he indignant, however he additionally handled my questioning with utter contempt. To at the present time, it is the worst interview I’ve ever skilled. In Rodgers’ case, Lewis appeared nonplussed by the comment, however she is properly inside her rights to really feel irritated by the best way she was so publicly ‘put down’.Do I feel Rodgers is a sexist or a misogynist? No, I don’t. Do I feel he used some poor language right here? Completely, and within the context of the state of affairs, it has backfired spectacularly.It might certainly be of profit, due to this fact, if Rodgers merely apologised and moved on. We dwell in an period now the place there’s a large quantity of sensitivity round sexism in soccer. There’s good motive for it, too. Girls proceed to get criticised for even daring to cowl the boys’s recreation. Simply take a look at Joey Barton, as an illustration. His tirade of abuse in the direction of feminine reporters is relentless.Commentators, journalists, feminine footballers, all of them get a bashing from males who merely don’t desire them anyplace close to the sphere of play. Behind the scenes, gamers nonetheless need to battle for equality in pay, circumstances, and medical provision. There ought to now be a widespread acknowledgement that language of this type just isn’t acceptable in an expert contextWhat we do not want now, is a person of Rodgers’ standing making an ill-judged remark that solely provides gas to the hearth.If there’s something constructive to come back out of this – and I hope there’s – it is a widespread acknowledgement that language of this type is solely not acceptable in an expert context. As Mark Twain as soon as mentioned: ‘The distinction between the just about proper phrase and the proper phrase is the distinction between the lightning bug and the lighting.’On this case, it could not be extra related.
Read more on dailymail
