Trump DA seeks gag order in hush cash case as ex-president appeals $454m fraud trial verdict: Dwell

The Manhattan district lawyer’s workplace is asking a legal courtroom decide to impose a restricted gag order towards Donald Trump, citing his “lengthy historical past” of “inflammatory” remarks aimed on the events concerned in his mountain of litigation.

A 331-page submitting on Monday cites his threatening social media posts – together with a photograph he posted that depicts him wielding a baseball bat behind District Legal professional Alvin Bragg’s head.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have repeatedly pointed to Donald Trump’s appointment of anti-abortion justices to the Supreme Court docket when discussing GOP-led threats to reproductive healthcare.

The courtroom’s 2022 reversal of abortion rights protections in a call to overturn Roe v Wade gave states vast latitude to enact restrictive abortion legal guidelines, and outline life as starting at conception – opening the door for extreme penalties and threats to reproductive care like IVF.

That 2022 choice has upended take care of tens of millions of People, with a broadly derided ruling from Alabama’s highest courtroom presenting the newest menace.

In her official vice presidential account on X, Ms Harris stated the previous president is “the architect of this well being care disaster” – teeing up a White Home message that may probably dominate 2024 campaigns.

The Manhattan district lawyer’s workplace is asking a legal courtroom decide to impose a restricted gag order towards Donald Trump, citing his “lengthy historical past” of “inflammatory” remarks aimed on the events concerned in his mountain of litigation.

A 331-page submitting on Monday cites Trump’s threatening social media posts, together with a photograph he posted that depicts him wielding a baseball bat behind District Legal professional Alvin Bragg’s head.

Attorneys for Donald Trump and his co-defendants filed paperwork with a New York appellate courtroom on Monday, arguing that the decide overseeing his fraud trial “dedicated errors” of regulation or details, “abused its discretion” and “acted in extra of its jurisdiction”.

However the $455m ruling towards him gained’t be paused till the previous president and his co-defendants put up a bond equal to the huge judgment towards them.

If a bond is just not posted inside a 30-day interval from the judgment, New York Legal professional Basic Letitia James’ workplace can start seizing his property. Monday’s ruling didn’t point out the bond.

The previous RNC chairman is on good type right here tearing into the conservative cable information channel over racist assumptions about Trump’s money-spinning gold high-tops.

The precise-wing lawyer is accused of concealing a social media account he denied he had from Michigan prosecutors as a result of it carried “dozens of damning posts that undercut his statements about his function within the election subversion scheme”, based on CNN.

The community stories that it has traced Chesebro to an account referred to as BadgerPundit, whose posts “reveal that even earlier than the 2020 election, after which simply two days after polls closed, Chesebro promoted a much more aggressive election subversion technique than he later let on in his Michigan interview”.

Chesebro’s attorneys advised CNN the account was his however that he had solely used it for “spitballing” theories concerning the election.

Their consumer was interviewed by investigators from the state’s lawyer basic’s workplace in December in regards to the pretend electors plot however was not charged with against the law.

He reportedly advised his inquisitors that the alternate slates of Republican electors proposed have been solely ever a contingency plan to have prepared in case the Trump marketing campaign gained any of its greater than 60 lawsuits difficult the election outcomes – which it didn’t.

A spokesman for Michigan lawyer basic Dana Nessel has since stated in a press release: “Our group is within the materials and can be trying into this matter.”

Home Republicans more and more consider there’s little probability of any impeachment vote ensuing from the investigations into Joe Biden, based on reporting by Axios.

After a yr of trying into the Biden household, little has been revealed concerning the alleged bribery and corruption of which the president, his son Hunter Biden and his brother Jim Biden have been accused.

“I don’t see it going anyplace substantive,” stated one Home Republican, including that there “aren’t near sufficient” GOP votes to question the president.

The lawmaker stated there have been “simply 40-50” Republicans who would probably vote towards an impeachment of President Biden.

Right here’s Oliver O’Connell’s report.

Right here’s Amelia Neath with extra on Saturday Evening Dwell’s newest Trump parody.

That is going to be attention-grabbing.

Right here’s Gustaf Kilander with extra on an sudden conflict of schedules.

The Donald continues to baselessly declare that Joe Biden is orchestrating his authorized comeuppance, this time alleging that the Justice Division is intentionally scheduling courtroom hearings to intrude together with his marketing campaign, though lots of the investigations into his conduct started lengthy earlier than he even introduced his candidacy on 15 November 2022.

He’s additionally persevering with to assault Nikki Haley, demanding that she resist the truth that she is just a “unhealthy candidate” – though virtually 40 per cent of South Carolina Republicans voted for her.