School tennis star recordsdata lawsuit over NCAA rule limiting gamers from incomes prize cash

The appearance of identify, picture, and likeness (NIL) continues to gasoline a firestorm throughout the school sports activities panorama.

NCAA guidelines stipulate that high school soccer gamers and another form of athlete can accumulate profitable funds in alternate for his or her autograph, their picture showing in an commercial, and extra beneath present NIL insurance policies.

Nonetheless, some athletes take part in particular person sports activities the place prize cash is usually connected to a given event or occasion. At present, school tennis gamers who’re awarded cash for successful an occasion are strictly prohibited from accumulating their winnings. The rule additionally applies to swimmers, gymnasts and others.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

However, North Carolina Tar Heels star tennis participant Reese Brantmeier is preventing again in opposition to the foundations which have possible value her tens of 1000’s of {dollars}. Brantmeier was compelled to start forgoing funds when she began competing in skilled tennis tournaments across the age of 14. 

Gathering funds might have put her school eligibility in jeopardy.

Brantmeier suffered a season-ending damage in February. She additionally just lately added her identify to the rising listing of athletes who oppose the NCAA rulebook because it pertains to NIL.

NICK SABAN URGES CONGRESS TO MAKE NIL ‘EQUAL ACROSS THE BOARD,’ EXPRESSES CONCERNS ON DARTMOUTH UNIONIZATION

“Over the past three years, tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} have flowed with the NCAA’s information and acquiescence, to largely male student-athletes within the Energy Conferences from third-party, booster-funded and operated collectives which might be related to nearly all NCAA FBS-level athletic departments and which sprung up in 2021 within the wake of the NCAA’s momentary suspension of its guidelines prohibiting identify, picture and likeness funds,” the lawsuit acknowledged.

“Whereas these tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars} have been paid to student-athletes beneath the guise of buying rights to make the most of their NIL, the overwhelming majority of the cash is in actuality ‘pay-for-play’ compensation to student-athletes that has little or no relation to the precise market worth for the supposed NIL providers that the student-athletes should present ‘in alternate’ for that compensation.”

The lawsuit was filed in opposition to the NCAA within the U.S. District Court docket in North Carolina, requesting the judiciary cease the affiliation from separating athletes who take part in particular person sports activities from their winnings.  

Brantmeier additionally just lately spoke out in opposition to the NCAA rulebook, saying it was “ridiculous” that school soccer and basketball gamers have been allowed to reap NIL advantages.

“It’s ridiculous to look at basketball and soccer gamers incomes tons of of 1000’s of {dollars}, and that’s OK beneath the identify, picture and likeness (NIL) guidelines, after which see us work simply as laborious and say we are able to’t earn cash immediately from our sport,” Brantmeier stated final week.

The NCAA didn’t instantly reply to a request from Fox Information Digital in search of touch upon the rule Brantmeier is contesting.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Brantmeier is at present the second-ranked participant in singles within the Intercollegiate Tennis Affiliation. She can also be a part of the top-ranked doubles group within the nation, alongside her associate Elizabeth Scotty.

Observe Fox Information Digital’s sports coverage on X and subscribe to the Fox Information Sports activities Huddle e-newsletter.