in

US to impose visa restrictions on Hong Kong officers over rights issues | Politics Information

US to impose visa restrictions on Hong Kong officers over rights issues | Politics Information


US says crackdown by Hong Kong officers consists of new nationwide safety legislation concentrating on treason, espionage and different crimes.

America has mentioned it would impose new visa restrictions on numerous Hong Kong officers answerable for cracking down on “rights and freedoms”, days after a draconian nationwide safety legislation went into power within the Chinese language-ruled territory.

The legislation ­- known as Article 23 – provides the federal government new powers to crack down on all types of dissent on the grounds of alleged treason, espionage, sedition and exterior interference in Hong Kong’s inner affairs.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Friday mentioned the laws may very well be used to suppress dissent inside Hong Kong and additional China’s marketing campaign to intimidate activists overseas.

“In response, the Division of State is asserting that it’s taking steps to impose new visa restrictions on a number of Hong Kong officers answerable for the intensifying crackdown on rights and freedoms,” Blinken mentioned.

His assertion didn’t establish the officers who can be focused.

It got here after Washington’s annual overview of Hong Kong’s autonomy, a standing promised by China when Britain handed over town in 1997.

“This 12 months, I’ve once more licensed that Hong Kong doesn’t warrant therapy underneath US legal guidelines in the identical method because the legal guidelines have been utilized to Hong Kong earlier than July 1, 1997,” Blinken mentioned.

The Hong Kong authorities mentioned sanctions and visa restrictions “smack of despicable political manipulation to intimidate the officers safeguarding nationwide safety”.

China’s embassy in Washington mentioned it firmly opposed US threats to “impose unwarranted unilateral sanctions” on Hong Kong.

“The US aspect disregards info, makes irresponsible remarks about Hong Kong affairs, and ranges groundless accusations” on the Chinese language and Hong Kong governments, the embassy posted on its web site.

Washington has imposed visa restrictions and different sanctions prior to now on Hong Kong officers blamed for undermining freedoms and introduced an finish to the particular financial therapy the territory lengthy loved underneath US legislation.

On Friday, the United Nations-funded Radio Free Asia (RFA) mentioned its Hong Kong bureau was closing due to security issues underneath Article 23.

Bay Fang, the RFA president, mentioned in an announcement that the outlet will not have full-time workers in Hong Kong however would retain official registration.

“Actions by Hong Kong authorities, together with referring to RFA as a ‘international power,’ elevate critical questions on our capability to function in security with the enactment of Article 23,” Bay mentioned.

Cedric Alviani, the Asia Pacific bureau director for Reporters With out Borders, known as the broadcaster’s withdrawal “a consequence of the chilling impact utilized on media shops” by the brand new safety legislation.

“We urge democracies to construct up strain on Chinese language authorities in order that press freedom is absolutely restored within the territory,” Alviani mentioned.

Hong Kong ranked 140 out of 180 nations and territories in Reporters With out Borders’s newest World Press Freedom Index.

#impose #visa #restrictions #Hong #Kong #officers #rights #issues #Politics #Information



Read more on aljazeera

Written by bourbiza mohamed

Bourbiza Mohamed is a freelance journalist and political science analyst holding a Master's degree in Political Science. Armed with a sharp pen and a discerning eye, Bourbiza Mohamed contributes to various renowned sites, delivering incisive insights on current political and social issues. His experience translates into thought-provoking articles that spur dialogue and reflection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

So, who’s guilty? Boss of images agency that provided to delete disabled youngsters from faculty class photograph says ‘it is not an organization coverage’ – with disaster assembly now deliberate to search out what actually occurred

So, who’s guilty? Boss of images agency that provided to delete disabled youngsters from faculty class photograph says ‘it is not an organization coverage’ – with disaster assembly now deliberate to search out what actually occurred

Newcastle v West Ham: Premier League – dwell | Premier League

Newcastle v West Ham: Premier League – dwell | Premier League