in

Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply over contaminated blood scandal, says minister, as campaigners name for him to lose peerage – UK politics dwell | Politics

Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply over contaminated blood scandal, says minister, as campaigners name for him to lose peerage – UK politics dwell | Politics


Minister says Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply, as contaminated blood campaigners say he ought to lose peerage over scandal

A cupboard minister has mentioned Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply after campaigners mentioned he ought to lose his peerage over his position within the contaminated blood scandal.

Clarke, who was a well being minister and well being secretary within the Eighties, was one of many former ministers criticised most explicitly in yesterday’s report. Though Sir Brian Langstaff made it clear that the scandal went on for many years, and concerned politicians and officers from a number of administrations, Clarke is a specific bête noir for campaigners due to the unsympathetic tone he struck when he gave proof.

Des Collins, a solicitor representing victims of the scandal, instructed the Day by day Telegraph: “The chair to the inquiry thinks [Clarke] was incorrect again within the day and I believe sure, he ought to have his peerage stripped. Take no prisoners. There are rather a lot who haven’t been singled out however he was one in all them.”

This morning Clive Smith, chairman of the Haemophilia Society, instructed LBC that Clarke gave proof to the inquiry that was “breathtaking within the excessive”.

Requested if Clarke ought to lose his peerage, Smith mentioned:

We wrote to the higher home when it was recommended that he was going to get a peerage, saying ‘Please don’t try this but, wait till the contaminated blood inquiry has reported’.

Now now we have the conclusions of the contaminated blood inquiry report, I believe our letter was well-timed and fully correct. The best way wherein he gave his proof (to the inquiry) was appalling.

Yesterday Smith mentioned Clarke ought to apologise to victims, not only for what he did as a minister, however for the style wherein he gave proof to the inquiry.

Eradicating a peerage from somebody is an excessive measure. It requires an act of parliament, and it has not occurred for the reason that first world conflict, when some friends misplaced their titles as a result of that they had supported Germany.

In an interview with Sky Information this morning, Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, ducked a query about Clarke’s peerage, saying that was a matter for the honours forfeiture committee.

However Stride didn’t totally assist his Tory colleague, and he mentioned Clarke had inquiries to reply. He mentioned:

Sir Brian has come ahead with some very sturdy observations of Ken, within the context of the scandal. Clearly there are questions that I’ve little doubt Ken shall be addressing in time.

As PA Media experiences, in 1983, an Aids leaflet was revealed alongside a press launch wherein Lord Clarke mentioned: “It has been recommended that Aids could also be transmitted in blood or blood merchandise. There isn’t any conclusive proof that that is so.” That line was repeated over a number of years.

Langstaff mentioned in his report on Monday:

This line to take, while technically appropriate, was indefensible. It didn’t spell out the actual threat. It gave false reassurance.

It lacked candour and, by not telling the entire fact, was deceptive.

It was not an correct reflection of the (Division of Well being’s) precise understanding, which was that it was doubtless that Aids was transmitted by means of blood and blood merchandise.

No minister challenged the ‘no conclusive proof’ line. They need to have completed.

Share

Up to date at 11.10 CEST

Key occasions

Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, is about to present his speech on antisemitism.

There’s a dwell feed right here.

Communities secretary Michael Gove delivers speech on antisemitism – watch dwell

And right here is Pippa Crerar’s preview story.

Share

Minister says Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply, as contaminated blood campaigners say he ought to lose peerage over scandal

A cupboard minister has mentioned Ken Clarke has inquiries to reply after campaigners mentioned he ought to lose his peerage over his position within the contaminated blood scandal.

Clarke, who was a well being minister and well being secretary within the Eighties, was one of many former ministers criticised most explicitly in yesterday’s report. Though Sir Brian Langstaff made it clear that the scandal went on for many years, and concerned politicians and officers from a number of administrations, Clarke is a specific bête noir for campaigners due to the unsympathetic tone he struck when he gave proof.

Des Collins, a solicitor representing victims of the scandal, instructed the Day by day Telegraph: “The chair to the inquiry thinks [Clarke] was incorrect again within the day and I believe sure, he ought to have his peerage stripped. Take no prisoners. There are rather a lot who haven’t been singled out however he was one in all them.”

This morning Clive Smith, chairman of the Haemophilia Society, instructed LBC that Clarke gave proof to the inquiry that was “breathtaking within the excessive”.

Requested if Clarke ought to lose his peerage, Smith mentioned:

We wrote to the higher home when it was recommended that he was going to get a peerage, saying ‘Please don’t try this but, wait till the contaminated blood inquiry has reported’.

Now now we have the conclusions of the contaminated blood inquiry report, I believe our letter was well-timed and fully correct. The best way wherein he gave his proof (to the inquiry) was appalling.

Yesterday Smith mentioned Clarke ought to apologise to victims, not only for what he did as a minister, however for the style wherein he gave proof to the inquiry.

Eradicating a peerage from somebody is an excessive measure. It requires an act of parliament, and it has not occurred for the reason that first world conflict, when some friends misplaced their titles as a result of that they had supported Germany.

In an interview with Sky Information this morning, Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, ducked a query about Clarke’s peerage, saying that was a matter for the honours forfeiture committee.

However Stride didn’t totally assist his Tory colleague, and he mentioned Clarke had inquiries to reply. He mentioned:

Sir Brian has come ahead with some very sturdy observations of Ken, within the context of the scandal. Clearly there are questions that I’ve little doubt Ken shall be addressing in time.

As PA Media experiences, in 1983, an Aids leaflet was revealed alongside a press launch wherein Lord Clarke mentioned: “It has been recommended that Aids could also be transmitted in blood or blood merchandise. There isn’t any conclusive proof that that is so.” That line was repeated over a number of years.

Langstaff mentioned in his report on Monday:

This line to take, while technically appropriate, was indefensible. It didn’t spell out the actual threat. It gave false reassurance.

It lacked candour and, by not telling the entire fact, was deceptive.

It was not an correct reflection of the (Division of Well being’s) precise understanding, which was that it was doubtless that Aids was transmitted by means of blood and blood merchandise.

No minister challenged the ‘no conclusive proof’ line. They need to have completed.

Share

Up to date at 11.10 CEST

Max Hill, a former director of public prosecutions, mentioned this morning that, though the company manslaughter cost couldn’t be used to prosecute folks concerned within the contaminated blood scandal, different choices had been obtainable.

He instructed Occasions Radio:

If the proof is there, there is no such thing as a bar to an investigation and a prosecution.

Now, sadly, company manslaughter got here into power as a prison offence on April 6, 2008 – a lot too late to take care of this case.

Nevertheless, there are different prison offences which pre-date company manslaughter, the place people have an obligation of care and [if] they breached that obligation in a gross method – that’s a authorized time period – they are often held liable.

Gross negligence manslaughter involves my thoughts and in addition misconduct in public workplace.

It’s not for me to know whether or not both of these are possible in these circumstances, however the prison legislation does present solutions similar to this even a long time after the occasion.

Share
Rishi Sunak with the Austrian chancellor Karl Nehammer in Vienna this morning. {Photograph}: Alex Halada/AFP/Getty Photographs
Sunak and Nehammer inspecting an honour guard. {Photograph}: Jordan Pettitt/AFP/Getty Photographs
Sunak and Nehammer coming into the Federal Chancellery Ballhausplatz in Vienna. {Photograph}: Jordan Pettitt/Reuters
Share

Austrian chancellor says Rwanda-style insurance policies wanted to take care of EU’s unlawful migration drawback after assembly with Sunak

The Austrian chancellor, Karl Nehammer, has described Rwanda-style deportation insurance policies as “a part of the answer” to the issue posed by unlawful migration.

Nehammer backed Rishi Sunak’s flagship coverage after the 2 leaders met in Vienna this morning for talks. In feedback to the press afterwards, Nehammer mentioned that he supported “the British path and the British mannequin” for coping with unlawful migration and he welcome the truth that 15 EU international locations have now spoken out in favour of gettting secure third international locations to course of asylum seekers.

In a message posted on X, Nehammer additionally thanked Sunak for his “sturdy assist” on this problem.

Prime Minister @RishiSunak and I agree: asylum procedures must be carried out in secure third international locations. This method requires strong safety of Europe‘s exterior borders alongside the establishement of well-functioning asylum facilities in these third international locations. Thanks for… pic.twitter.com/9RBLnrT6Lv

— Karl Nehammer (@karlnehammer) May 21, 2024

Prime Minister @RishiSunak and I agree: asylum procedures must be carried out in secure third international locations. This method requires strong safety of Europe‘s exterior borders alongside the establishement of well-functioning asylum facilities in these third international locations. Thanks to your sturdy assist.

Of their joint look earlier than the media, Sunak mentioned that unlawful migration has change into “really one of many defining problems with our time” and that “we face prison gangs which can be rising in energy throughout the European continent and past”.

He mentioned Nehammer had been “proper on this problem for a very long time” and has been bringing consideration to it in Europe. He added:

It’s more and more clear that many different international locations now agree that that’s the method that’s required – daring, novel, taking a look at secure nation partnerships.

Rishi Sunak and Austrian chancellor Karl Nehammer chatting with the media within the Austrian Chancellery in Vienna this morning. {Photograph}: Max Slovencik/EPA
Share

Up to date at 10.34 CEST

Minister claims it is ‘not inconceivable’ that officers or politicians might face prosecution over contaminated blood scandal

Good morning. At this time there shall be additional response to the huge and damning report from Sir Brian Langstaff’s contaminated blood inquiry. Rishi Sunak instructed MPs yesterday that the federal government would pay “complete compensation to these contaminated and people affected by this scandal” and John Glen, the Cupboard Workplace minister, will make a press release to the Commons on this after 12.30pm. However there may be additionally rising curiosity in whether or not any of these accountable could face prosecution.

Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, was doing a media spherical this morning and he described prosecutions as “not inconceivable”. Requested if officers or politicians might be taken to court docket over what occurred, Stride replied:

I believe all of these issues ought to and shall be checked out … I’ve little doubt that each one of these issues shall be extraordinarily fastidiously checked out, as a result of in that 2,700-page report, there are various questions and lots of brief failings which have surfaced, they usually all must be checked out very fastidiously. And it isn’t inconceivable that what you’ve described could also be one thing that transpires.

Stride is one in all a number of politicians giving speeches on what is ready to be a busy day for political information. Right here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Rishi Sunak is assembly Karl Nehammer, the Austrian chancellor, in Vienna.

10am: Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, offers a speech on antisemitism.

10.45am: Angela Rayner, the deputy Labour chief and shadow levelling up secretary, offers a speech on Labour’s plans for brand new cities.

11am: Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, offers a speech on welfare reform.

11.30am: Downing Avenue holds a foyer briefing.

Lunchtime: The federal government is because of publish a long-awaited report from John Woodcock (Lord Walney) on political violence and disruption.

After 12.30pm: John Glen, the Cupboard Workplace minister, offers a press release to MPs on compensation for victims of the contaminated blood scandal.

2.30pm: Andrew Mitchell, the deputy international secretary, and Alan Mak, a commerce minister, give proof to the Commons enterprise committee on arms exports to Israel.

If you wish to contact me, please put up a message under the road (BTL) or message me on X (Twitter). I can’t learn all of the messages BTL, however when you put “Andrew” in a message geared toward me, I’m extra more likely to see it as a result of I seek for posts containing that phrase. If you wish to flag one thing up urgently, it’s best to make use of X; I’ll see one thing addressed to @AndrewSparrow in a short time. I discover it very useful when readers level out errors, even minor typos (no error is simply too small to appropriate). And I discover your questions very attention-grabbing too. I can’t promise to answer to all of them, however I’ll attempt to reply to as many as I can, both BTL or generally within the weblog.

Share

Up to date at 10.32 CEST

#Ken #Clarke #questions #reply #contaminated #blood #scandal #minister #campaigners #name #lose #peerage #politics #dwell #Politics



Read more on the guardian

Written by bourbiza mohamed

Bourbiza Mohamed is a freelance journalist and political science analyst holding a Master's degree in Political Science. Armed with a sharp pen and a discerning eye, Bourbiza Mohamed contributes to various renowned sites, delivering incisive insights on current political and social issues. His experience translates into thought-provoking articles that spur dialogue and reflection.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Belarusians who fought towards Russia with Ukraine face new battle | Russia-Ukraine battle Information

Belarusians who fought towards Russia with Ukraine face new battle | Russia-Ukraine battle Information

Nice Osobor: English basketball star set to make m earlier than turning professional | School basketball

Nice Osobor: English basketball star set to make $2m earlier than turning professional | School basketball